What keeps you up at night today
Your developers are already asking for Claude Code, Codex or Copilot, and many already use them on the side. Saying no no longer protects you: approved AI that never arrives gets replaced by whatever people have at hand, and that leaves no trail.
But saying yes with what the agents ship isn’t enough either:
- Each agent protects itself its own way, on each laptop, with its own settings.
- The agent may hold the keys: to the model, the repository and internal APIs.
- Approving is a click by the same developer who asked, and it lasts forever.
- There is no evidence of what the agent saw, what it did and who authorized it.
What you gain with Harkaq
One policy for every agent. Define once what the agent can see, do and where it can send data in each project. If the team switches agents tomorrow, the policy stays the same.
Zero credentials in the agent. Keys live outside the workspace and the gateway injects them on the way out. If the agent falls into a trap, there is nothing to steal.
A single gateway that checks the action, not just the destination. The gateway decides per operation: pushing an agent branch yes, deleting the main branch no. It scans everything that leaves for secrets and blocks whatever it can’t inspect.
Approval is no longer a click by the same developer. Anything new is approved by someone else, who sees exactly what is being requested and why. The permission is single-use and expires on its own.
Evidence, not promises. Every action goes into a hash-chained log, and the evidence report for auditors and regulators is one click away.
Without Security becoming the bottleneck
If developers don’t need to decide anything, they see no prompts. When something is blocked, the agent explains why and offers the permitted path, instead of an “access denied” that pushes people back to unsanctioned AI. Security goes from blocking AI to enabling it.